Quick News Spot

CVS's Attorney-Client Privilege Claims Rejected by Judge in Qui Tam Action | The Legal Intelligencer


CVS's Attorney-Client Privilege Claims Rejected by Judge in Qui Tam Action | The Legal Intelligencer

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected CVS Health's "ploy" of claiming privilege and work-product protection over communications with a third party about flash freezing shipping processes in a qui tam action against the retail pharmacy chain.

Concluding a majority of the communications did not pertain to any legal advice or questions that required the information to be privileged, U.S. District Judge Gerald Austin McHugh of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in an Aug. 15 opinion, in part granted a motion to compel by the plaintiff, Stan Ellis. The documents at issue involved communications over CVS' flash shipping process with a "cold chain" shipping expert, The Illuminate Group.

Previous articleNext article

POPULAR CATEGORY

corporate

2885

tech

3178

entertainment

3475

research

1459

misc

3691

wellness

2723

athletics

3601