Elon Musk is easily the world's wealthiest man, with a net worth topping $300 billion.
But even he stands to make more money from his association with the federal government after placing a winning bet on Donald Trump's election to the presidency.
"It's going to be a golden era for Musk with Trump in the White House," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said.
Musk's aerospace company SpaceX received billions of dollars in federal contracts, and could be in line for more, while his five other businesses could gain from a lighter regulatory touch.
Trump named Musk to co-head a new Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE -- a nod to the cryptocurrency Musk adores. However, federal law bars executive branch employees, which can include unpaid consultants, from participating in government matters that will affect their financial interests, unless they divest of their interests or recuse themselves.
People are also reading... Flick: Mourning Larry Carius, who provided public service for McLean County food lovers Live statewide IHSA football semifinals playoff score updates Here are the IHSA football semifinals playoff matchups Here's who will be on the April ballot in Bloomington-Normal Lifelong Access names interim CEO Bellflower man accused of soliciting sexually explicit photos from children With no contract and eroding patience, Illinois State faculty union calls for mediator Flick Fact: What well-known store was where the Michaels store is today? Yes, we're open: Where to find a Thanksgiving meal in McLean County 🥧 Your burrito fix awaits at Poblano in downtown Bloomington Busy Corner to be closed until new year following fire Heartland Community College announces Country Financial Trail for Normal campus Women report widespread misogyny in churches tied to religious group 'The Message' Flick Fact: Who coined the famed phrase, 'Will it play in Peoria?' Trump chooses Pam Bondi for attorney general pick after Gaetz withdraws
Trump's transition team has sought a work-around, saying he would "provide advice and guidance from outside of Government" with the work concluding by July 2026, according to a news release.
Richard Painter, a University of Minnesota Law School professor and former chief White House ethics lawyer, said that if Musk is truly working outside the government he doesn't have to sell his assets, but that limits his influence.
"He can make recommendations, but ultimately the decisions are made by government officials," Painter said.
Trump's campaign and Musk's companies didn't respond to requests for comment.
Here's how Musk could benefit from Trump's presidency.
SpaceX
If there's one Musk business that could profit the most from the incoming Trump administration, it's SpaceX.
The company, which announced this year it would move its headquarters from California to Texas, already received at least $21 billion in federal funds since its 2002 founding, according to government contracting research firm The Pulse. That includes contracts for launching military satellites, servicing the International Space Station and building a lunar lander.
However, that figure could be dwarfed by a federal initiative to fund a Mars mission, which is the stated goal of SpaceX.
"Elon Musk is wealthy, but he's not wealthy enough to completely fund humans to Mars. It needs to be a public/private partnership, because of the tens of billions of dollars that this would cost, or even hundreds of billions dollars," said Laura Forczyk, executive director of space industry consulting firm Astralytical.
SpaceX already made big strides testing Musk's Starship rocket, the most powerful ever built. NASA envisions employing the rocket in its Artemis program to return humans to the moon, but it has been designed to have enough thrust to propel a spacecraft to Mars. What's more, Trump, during his first presidency, speculated on Twitter about why the United States was focusing on the moon instead of Mars.
Still, there are technical challenges, with SpaceX yet to complete the $4 billion Starship lunar lander, which would have to be modified for Mars. And without a pressing geopolitical threat, Congress may be unwilling to spend more on space exploration, as it did during the 1960s with the Apollo program, Forczyk said.
Should a Mars project not materialize, SpaceX could still reap rewards in the next four years. For example, the Federal Communications Commission denied SpaceX nearly $900 million in federal subsidies to provide rural broadband access through its Starlink satellite network. Under new FCC leadership, Forczyk sees that being reversed.
Tesla
Trump's policies could reduce the sales of electric vehicles, but with Musk's influence, his administration's policies could boost Tesla -- though not with federal funding.
For example, Trump, who tempered criticism of electric vehicles after Musk backed him, might end a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. That would hurt Tesla's unprofitable rivals that rely more on the tax credits to lure customers.
"Tesla is the only automaker that has the scale and scope to price vehicles in a $30,000-to-$40,000 range and make significant profits," Ives said. "It would essentially take competition out of the market."
Trump's Republican administration also is considering imposing tariffs on Mexico and China, which could make cars more expensive. Ives said he expects Trump to make exceptions for Tesla and Apple so they're not hit by a tax on imported goods.
Tesla receives only a smattering of federal contracts, according to USAspending.gov, a database that tracks U.S. government spending.
This year, Tesla received at least $2.8 million from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation through a federally funded program to deploy EV charging stations.
xAI and X
Musk's startup xAI doesn't appear to have federal government contracts, but artificial intelligence companies could benefit in other ways under Trump.
Republicans and Musk have expressed support for cutting regulation to fuel AI innovation, a crucial part of the future of tech companies.
But Musk has also warned that AI could pose a threat to humanity, and it's unclear how Trump plans to address potential safety risks that come with technology including fraud, bias and disinformation.
X, formerly known as Twitter, served as an online megaphone for Musk, who constantly shared his support for Trump during the election season.
The social media site, which recently relocated its San Francisco headquarters to Texas, doesn't appear to have any federal government contracts, but X could benefit from policy changes that affect its rivals such as Meta and TikTok.
Musk, who has declared himself a "free speech absolutist," recently shared an old Trump video with the words "YES!" In the video from 2022, Trump says he would change Section 230, a law that shields platforms from liability for user-generated content.
Platforms would qualify for immunity only if the companies "meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness and nondiscrimination," Trump said.
The Boring Co.
Fed up with Los Angeles traffic, Elon Musk launched The Boring Co. with two tweets in 2016, promising "to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging."
The Bastrop, Texas, company, formerly headquartered in Hawthorne, has completed a 1.7-mile loop under the Las Vegas Convention Center and is building a larger citywide loop -- both without federal funding. Projects in some other cities didn't get past the proposal stages.
However, at Trump's urging, congressional representatives could earmark local transportation projects to the benefit of Boring Co., though the company would still have to compete to win them, said Greg Griffin, a former urban planning professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio, who studied that city's proposed Boring Co. project.
Neuralink
Controlling robotic limbs. Seeing without eyes. Those are the kinds of miraculous advances Musk's Neuralink startup has been trying to achieve.
The Fremont, California, company he co-founded in 2016 doesn't receive federal money, but its technology and clinical trails are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. The more hands-off approach favored by Trump could aid such medical device developers.
"We're concerned that regulation in general in the FDA will be weakened under the second Trump administration, and particularly concerned about medical devices," said Dr. Robert Steinbrook, health research group director for the consumer rights group Public Citizen.
Love 0 Funny 0 Wow 0 Sad 0 Angry 0
Be the first to know
Get local news delivered to your inbox!
Sign up! * I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.