Quick News Spot

Cate Blanchett and Alfonso Cuarón on the Shocking Twist at the End of 'Disclaimer': 'I Just Wanted to Get It Off My Chest'


Cate Blanchett and Alfonso Cuarón on the Shocking Twist at the End of 'Disclaimer': 'I Just Wanted to Get It Off My Chest'

SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains spoilers from "VII," the finale of "Disclaimer," now streaming on Apple TV+.

The final beats of "Disclaimer" utterly upend what had come before.

Up to this point, we're given to believe that Stephen (Kevin Kline) is on a misguided but fundamentally fact-based mission to avenge the death of his son, Jonathan; his belief is that Catherine (Cate Blanchett), whom he is stalking, had allowed his son to drown after the pair had a romantic liaison on vacation in Italy years before. His vision of events -- shared with his late wife Nancy -- exists in a novel Nancy wrote, one that Stephen has wielded as a cudgel to ruin Catherine's reputation within her family and in her professional life as a documentarian.

Jonathan did die in Catherine's presence, but what evidence Stephen has is misleading; as Catherine explains to Stephen, in a stunning sequence that took days to film, she had been systematically assaulted by Jonathan over hours, and has been carrying with her not only the shock of Jonathan's death and the guilt that he died in trying to rescue the son she'd allowed into the sea unattended, but also the trauma of an assault. For six episodes, Catherine has tactitly allowed those around her to believe the story that Stephen has spread. In the seventh, she explodes.

This confrontation reframes all of "Disclaimer," and cements the show's place as one of the year's defining TV events. Variety spoke to Blanchett and to Alfonso Cuarón -- who wrote and directed each of the show's episodes -- about the show's endgame, and about what made Catherine such a rich character to play even as, for so much of the show, she's defined by how others see her.

Alfonso Cuarón: The work for that moment was done throughout the other six chapters. That was the collaboration with Cate -- she was adamant to make sure that every single detail of what we're telling is the truth, that we're not manipulating the information. When Catherine speaks, you realize that your perception was tainted by a judgment -- not only of the other characters, but also your own judgment. She hasn't been allowed to speak for so long; all of these characters have been shutting her up, and finally, you're hearing her voice.

Cate Blanchett: It's a reconciliation, in a way, with herself and with that past. The things that we run from or bury or think we can avoid end up becoming our psychological and emotional nemeses. And we didn't talk a lot about it, but we both had an understanding that we all wear a lot of social masks. In a long marriage, you become something for the other person -- what the other person needs you to do is a projection of what the other person believes you to be. And it was really important in that scene that there was no mask.

Sometimes we can't unpack these things by ourselves. And I think why a lot of people don't report violent assault is because by being not believed in the reliving of something is to be re-traumatized. I was hoping that at the beginning of that scene, you'd think, "Oh, this is going to be the reconciliation scene.." And, through the course of it, she realizes, "I don't think I can reconcile with you." But I didn't want it to be that she gets vengeance on this man who didn't believe her. Women aren't seeking vengeance when they describe what they have felt. They are seeking clarity and understanding, often with themselves.

Blanchett: Having to tell, for the first time, what happened to you to somebody who is actually trying to do you harm was a very nightmarish sort of strange reality. Once the story comes out, to not be able to stop it -- it's a runaway train.

And so for a moment... [To Cuarón:] The way you play with time is really interesting, because the time that the story happens in is relatively short, but we have these long, elastic moments when there's such an enormous sense of danger. We decided two days prior [to shooting the confrontation] that we'd record all of it, 40 pages or whatever, so that you had the chance to play with what would be onscreen with Kevin and I, and then what would be back in Italy.

Cuarón: It was very important, because doing it that way allows us to stay in the present tense. It was so important to see her speak, and to minimize the times that we went into the past. It's a thin line in which you're going to portray a scene like such that you don't present it in an exploitative way.

Blanchett: With Alfonso? Yeah, no. You start doing a take, and you think, "OK, this is the end." And then Chivo [cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki] comes up and goes like that [mimes flicking a mote of dust off her face]. But by that stage, we'd all been working together for a really long time, so we were sort of one organism -- and I lost track of time. I don't know whether we shot for two days or three days, because there were so many perspectives that were being synthesized.

Blanchett: You think, "Oh, gosh, I'm going to have to read 40 pages of dialogue." You dread it. But I was like "Bring it on." I just wanted, as an actor, to get it off my chest.

Cuarón: When Cate finished that scene, at the end of the last take, she just went berserk. She was jumping around! It was clear that it was a big relief.

Blanchett: Do you remember what happened then? I went "Have we finished? Have we got it?" Yep, we've got it. It's all coming back to me. I went back to my trailer; [the next shot] was going to be a wide shot on Kevin. And I sat back down, of course, still absolutely present. The camera was looking at me. And I went, "Hang on a minute..." We had to do another take. I just went "OK, I need to go to the bathroom." Then I came back, and we had to go again.

Cuarón: I witnessed the eyes of someone hating me.

Blanchett: Well, there's enough examples of it in the real world, aren't there? I'm surprised there's not more of them. But to me, the biggest challenge was creating a character that was porous enough and ambiguous enough that the audience could lose themselves in another character's perspective on her -- that there was nothing that stood out or signaled anything, but that was hopefully interesting enough to stay with for seven episodes. That was my little tricky dance.

Previous articleNext article

POPULAR CATEGORY

corporate

3391

tech

3673

entertainment

4112

research

1774

misc

4368

wellness

3243

athletics

4258